Showing posts with label false flag. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false flag. Show all posts

23 June 2007

Israeli attack was deliberate

Jacksonville.com
Israeli attack was deliberate
Last modified 6/21/2007 - 3:47 pm
Originally created 062207
By The Times-Union and AP

I understand and sympathize with the motives behind a June 15 letter regarding the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in June 1967.

Some facts, however, may have escaped the letter writer's attention. The facts established the Israeli attack as a deliberate attempt to sink a U.S. naval vessel with all hands aboard. The attack was not unintentional.


On June 8, 1967, the USS Liberty was steaming slowly in international waters 14 miles off the Sinai Peninsula. The Liberty was not under National Security Agency direction, although it serviced NSA collection requirements.

It was under U.S. naval command. In 1961, the U.S. Navy commissioned six vessels as electronic intelligence and communications intelligence collectors.

The Liberty was one of them. It was sailing from Rota, Spain, under Commander in Chief U.S. Navy Europe movement order 7/67. Its naval designation was AGTR-5.


Moyshe Dayan did not contact the Pentagon to ask if the USS Liberty was an American ship. There was no need, The ship's markings, AGTR-5, were painted 10 feet tall on both sides of the bow, which identified it in Jane's Fighting Ships as a U.S. signal intelligence ship. It was also flying a huge holiday-size American flag on its fan tail, which was subsequently shot to pieces by the Israelis.

The ship was approached by an Israeli reconnaissance aircraft. It made several passes over the ship so low the Israeli airmen and Liberty sailors waved at each other.

The ship was then attacked by fighter aircraft in repeated strafing and rocketing passes. During these attacks, the Israelis were jamming Liberty radio transmissions. The ship was attacked by two waves of fighter aircraft, then three torpedo boats arrived and fired five torpedoes at the ship.

One of them killed 24 of the 39 Liberty crewmen killed during the attack. The torpedo boats then circled and fired machine guns at the bridge and 40 millimetre shells at the Liberty's waterline.

The order to abandon ship was given and life rafts were put over the side. The torpedo boats then closed and machine gunned all the rafts, sinking them.

There is much to say about why the Johnson administration chose to ignore the attack. But, government agencies were ordered not to mention it. Some U.S. military officers wanted to bomb Israel.


Israel is a good ally of the United States, but we have other good allies in the area. U.S. relations with Israel should be kept in perspective, and the public should not be misled.

RONALD E. ESTES
St. Augustine



.

11 June 2007

US college rejects Jewish professor over anti-Israel stance

Guardian Unlimited
US college rejects Jewish professor over anti-Israel stance
Ed Pilkington in New York
Monday June 11, 2007
Guardian Unlimited



Professor Norman Finkelstein.
Professor Norman Finkelstein. Photograph: Kathy Willens/AP
One of the most rancorous disputes in American academia has ended with a prominent political scientist, with controversial views on Israel and anti-Semitism, being denied tenure at one of the country's top-10 private universities.

Norman Finkelstein, author of The Holocaust Industry, now has less than a year remaining on his contract with the political sciences department of DePaul university in Chicago. He lost his bid for a lifelong post following a 4-3 vote of the university's promotions and tenure board.

The decision came at the end of several months of wrangling, both within the Catholic university and within the wider academic and Jewish communities in the US.

Mr Finkelstein has argued in his books that claims of anti-Semitism are used to dampen down criticism of Israeli policy towards the Palestinians and that the Holocaust is exploited by some Jewish institutions for their own gain.

His outspoken position as a Jewish intellectual critical of Israel and of some elites within the Jewish community has prompted passionate debate on both sides of the argument.

Prominent intellectuals such as the prolific writer, Noam Chomsky, and the Oxford historian, Avi Schlaim, have spoken out in Mr Finkelstein's favour, but others have decried him in equal measure as giving succour to anti-Semitism.

His most bitter opponent is Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor, who campaigned heavily to prevent tenure being granted. Soon after Mr Finkelstein applied for it, Mr Dershowitz sent DePaul faculty members a dossier of what he categorised as the

"most egregious academic sins, outright lies, misquotations, and distortions"
of the political scientist.

The dispute has roots that go deeper still, with Mr Finkelstein devoting much of his most recent book,

Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History,
to an attack on Mr Dershowitz's own work, the Case for Israel. Mr Dershowitz threatened to sue.

Mr Finkelstein, the son of Holocaust survivors, has responded to the decision in essence to sack him from his job at DePaul by condemning the vote as an act of political aggression.

"I met the standards of tenure DePaul required, but it wasn't enough to overcome the political opposition to my speaking out on the Israel-Palestine conflict."

He told the Chicago Sun-Times that the bruising confrontation would have no impact on his beliefs or his determination to speak out.

"They can deny me tenure, deny me the right to teach. But they will never stop me from saying what I believe."

On his website, he has posted letters of support from several students and alumni of DePaul. Mr Finkelstein's own department of political science lobbied in favour of tenure, but he was opposed by the dean of the college of liberal arts and sciences.

DePaul, founded in 1898 and with the motto "I will show you the way of wisdom", is the largest Catholic university in the US. It employs over 800 full-time faculty members.

The president of the university, Rev Dennis Holtschneider, who made the final decision, put out a statement explaining why he endorsed the rejection of tenure - a decision that normally remains private under academic protocol. He acknowledged that the university would be criticised on grounds of free speech, but said the accusations would be wrong.

"Some will consider this decision in the context of academic freedom. In fact, academic freedom is alive and well at DePaul," he said.

The president also made a clear reference to the Finkelstein-Dershowitz fisticuffs, saying there had been considerable outside debate.

"This attention was unwelcome and inappropriate and had no impact on either the process or the outcome of this case."

The decision is likely to provoke a renewed outburst of debate. Mr Chomsky said before the announcement, the dispute was

"outrageous. [Finkelstein] is an outstanding scholar. It's amazing that he hasn't had full professorship a long time ago".

--------------

Although the political science department of the university had praised Finkelstein and recommended tenure, according to university president Dennis Holtschneider, Finkelstein's

"unprofessional personal attacks divert the conversation away from consideration of ideas, and polarize and simplify conversations that deserve layered and subtle consideration."....International Herald Tribune
U.S. university denies tenure to professor who questioned Holocaust compensation

______________


10 June 2007

American treachery in the attack on the USS Liberty much deeper than previously assumed

Crescent And Cross

American treachery in the attack on the USS Liberty much deeper than previously assumed


For those who follow the intrigues and explosive events surrounding the relationship between America and Israel over the last 4 decades it is easy to “get into a rut” so to speak and blame every single catastrophic event solely on the treachery of Israel. The tragedy though (and certainly the part hardest to swallow by patriotic Americans who would just as soon take their own lives as betray their fellow countrymen) is that there have been and are players on the American side of the equation whose hands are just as dirty as those of their Israeli counterparts. Whether it was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the assassination of JFK, the bombing of the Twin Towers in 1993, the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in 1995 or the events taking place on 9/11, the fact is that the only way these could have taken place is if elements within the US government infrastructure cooperated with the planning, execution and subsequent dissemination of propaganda in the aftermath of these operations.

Now, a new and terrible tale has surfaced indicating yet again that elements of the US government were involved at the highest level in even more criminal acts against the very same American people whom she is charged with protecting. The case in question involves the June 8th, 1967 attack on the USS Liberty by the air and naval forces of the state of Israel during the height of the Arab-Israeli War that led to the deaths of 34 American servicemen. Long-believed that players within the Johnson administration simply assisted in the cover-up of the attack so as “not to embarrass” America’s greatest ally, Israel, it now it appears that American political, intelligence and military persons played a key role in setting up the Liberty for the purpose of igniting WWIII in what was code-named “Operation Cyanide”.

It was a heady time, to be sure. The US and the USSR were neck-deep in what was called the Cold War and by all appearances it seemed that a shooting match between the two superpowers was an inevitability. The reader should keep in mind that this was only a few short years after the Cuban Missile Crisis and a time when America seemed unable to stop the spread of communism in Asia and other parts of the world. In the Middle East, states such as Egypt, with dynamic, fiery and recalcitrant leaders such as Nasser were forming strong bonds with the Soviets for military and economic aid. Using the same rational that led to America inserting herself militarily into areas such as Korea and Vietnam, it was believed that if not stopped the Soviets would entrench themselves in the Middle East to the point that America’s access to the oil of that region would be directly jeopardized and that, just as the communists had predicted decades before, the West would be conquered “without a shot being fired”.

It has long been assumed that Israel’s deliberate attack on the USS Liberty was just another of her made-to-order false flag operations done simply for the purpose of dragging an unwilling America into a Middle East war on the side of the Jewish state. However,new information uncovered by former BBC investigative journalist Peter Hounam reveals that America–and more specifically the administration of Lyndon Johnson–was not as much the unsuspecting victim in all of this that she has claimed these last 40 years. Based on relatively new evidence, the attack on the Liberty was actually part of a much larger plan and that the Liberty incident was just one domino in a series of them that had as the ultimate goal a real-live shooting war between the US and the USSR. Had the Liberty been sunk with no witnesses as planned, the world would be a much different place now as a result, and certainly not for the better.

In short, what was planned for that awful day in American history was that the a defenseless, unarmed American ship sailing in international waters off the coast of Egypt be sunk to the bottom of the Mediterranean and that the Soviets and their Arab allies (in particular Egypt) would be blamed for the event. As with the sinking of the USS Maine nearly 70 years earlier, the cry would be “Remember the USS Liberty” and America’s “justifiable” response to such a horrendous act would be the launching of nuclear weapons against Egypt, the USSR’s ally. Working in tandem with the US would be allies such as Israel, Great Britain and, interestingly, Australia. The end result would be a Middle East free of any Soviet presence, leaving America and her ally Israel in possession of Arab oil for the foreseeable future and in a better position to dictate terms to the communists.

In the minds of powerful men such as these–men who sit in comfortable offices and expensive chairs and who do not have to answer to anyone for their actions, the rationale for such an act is simple–better that 300 men die in the service of their country than that the ‘free world’ fall into the clutches of Soviet communism. What prevented all of this from taking place was that–simply by the grace of God–the Liberty did not sink and the world was spared, at least temporarily.

Of course there is no official confirmation of Operation Cyanide. In fact there is no mention of it at all. In various interviews that have been conducted over the years, individuals from Secretary of Defense McNamara to Dean Rusk to Richard Helms to Mossad spy chief Rafael Eitan have demonstrated great intellectual and verbal energy for men their age when discussing various items but who then clam up instantaneously when Operation Cyanide is mentioned as if they were witnesses to a Mafia hit and feared for their lives.

Nevertheless the smaller players who were involved at that time have a different tale to tell, and piecing together all the small parts that they individually bring to the table fleshes out a picture that, although not crystal clear, is clear enough to suggest that America was involved in the murder of 34 of her young men on June 8th 1967 in a much deeper fashion than previously thought. For the sake of those men who died that day and for those who survived the attack physically but who have endured the assault of lies that has been waged against them these last 40 years, the truth concerning what took place that day must be told. In the opinion of many, the Liberty incident may very well hold the key to freeing America from the bondage she suffers under men such as those who have murdered–not only her people, but as well her political system.

Beginning in June, AFP will begin running a series of exclusive articles going into deeper detail the mechanics of “Operation Cyanide” with an individual who worked in US Intelligence circles and has first-hand knowledge of the events that took place before, during and after June 8th 1967. What he has to say has never before been published.

Mark Glenn–Correspondent, American Free Press

americanfreepress@yahoo.com

www.americanfreepress.net

May 31st, 2007

Recent Undisclosed Mossad 'False Flag' Operations, III

codshit.com
Recent Undisclosed Mossad 'False Flag' Operations, III
by Trowbridge H. Ford
The Lindh Assassination from the Mossad's Perspective


Now that the assassination of Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic has been officially covered up - especially thanks to the two assassinations of Dr. David Kelly and former Swedish Foreign Minister Anna Lindh which came after it, and are intimately connected to it - it is time to complete my examination of the three murders which the war on terror necessitated, and Meir Dagan's Mossad apparently saw to the accomplishment of - what he vowed to do to any supporter of alleged Muslim terrorism after Al-Qaeda killed 13 Israelis tourists in a Mombasa hotel with a car bomb, and another 261 when it nearly shot down an airliner departing from its airport in November 2002. While Djindjic was murdered to make sure that none of its most secret operations to help Serbian nationalist Slobodan Milosevic's war against Muslims leaked out after the ouster of Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Kelly was killed for fear that his claims to the BBC's Andrew Gillian about Downing Street's 'sexing up' his claims about its WMD threatened a critical review by him of the whole neocon adventure in the Middle East which would reveal its Mossad origins, and Lindh's followed because it was feared that she would use it to make a damaging political case against Israel's political existence.


Djindjic's assassination had long been in the offing since the vastly exaggerated claims about Saddam's WMD - thanks to alleged critical assistance across the board from the ousted Serbian President - were proving increasingly untrue since the Iraqi dictator was not threatening to use them, especially nuclear weapons made with material from Belgrade's Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, as a last resort to save his regime. The delay in the killing had been caused by finding the proper assassins, making enough unsuccessful attempts to fool the public about who was behind it and why, and waiting until just the last moment before the invasion of Iraq to insure that the killing would soon be overshadowed by what happened in the Middle East - what would lead the media to soon write off the shooting as just more senseless Serbian violence, especially when the two assassins, it seemed, were cornered, and conveniently killed in a police shootout during the subsequent state of emergency. In the process, it was thought, Serbian President Vojislav Kostunica and his security apparatus, including Israeli operators, who helped plot the whole process would escape detection.

The event which triggered Djindjic's assassination was neither the overthrow of Milosevic nor his being shipped off to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia for human rights violations, as Franko 'Frenki' Simatovic's Red Berets had gone along with these damage-limitation measures. It was the belated arrests for similar crimes in November 2002 of the infamous Banovic twins, Nenad and Predrag, by Milorad 'Legija' Ulemek aka Milorad Lukovic which started the process rolling. 'Legija' was so upset by their arrests that his force then shut down the center of Belgrade, but the two former guards at the infamous Keraterm prison were still shipped off to The Hague for trial. Ulemek still managed to get the Djindjic government to sack its secret service chief, Goran Petrovic, and his deputy, Goran Mijatovic, for this apparently reckless act - what threatened to expose who were really the brains behind the ethic-cleansing in Bosnia-Hercegovina, and later in Kosovo, clearing the way for Zoran's assassination.
The Banovic brothers 'Ban' and 'Capo' were deeply involved in brutally torturing and killing the most knowledgeable Muslims for information in clearing the area around Prijedor of Bosniacs and Croatians - what threatened to reveal the real make-up of the 300 Red Berets aka 'Frenki's Boys' leading the operation. 'Frenki' was so concerned about keeping their identity secret that he once threatened to kill a reporter who tried to take their picture if he ever tried it again. His greatest concern was about the identity of self-proclaimed volunteers, especially Jews, who had come from outside Yugoslavia to settle scores with Bosniacs and Croatians for previous alleged crimes against their people. Recently, Christopher Walker of The Times acknowledged that around 40 Israeli volunteers were still helping the Serbs control Kosovo in recognition of what the Partisans had done during WWII to help Jews from Nazi oppression - what had required a larger Israeli force, and a more official one when the Serbs were trying to prevent the breakup of Yugoslavia a decade earlier.

The danger of the Banovic brothers, and their prison associates talking about who was behind and directing the terror campaign against non-Serbs in Bosnia increased in February 2003 when Dragan Vasiljkovic supplied the ICTY with a video he had taken of the whole Belgrade security force which had secured the area north of the Una river around Glina for Greater Serbia. Vasiljkovic aka Captain Dragan, an ex-patriot from Australia, had returned to Serbia to help out in the ethnic-cleansing, and he led the force which cleared the area. The video - what Vasiljkovic had taken himself - showed apparently the presence of many Israelis in the group, possibly even including the IDF's Meir Dagan who was carrying out Ariel Sharon's call for wiping out alleged Muslim terrorisim, and called it quits after the conclusion of the Bosnian war. Of course, the submission not only panicked the ICTY but also those worried about having to answer war crimes charges still back in Serbia.

The only hitch with the assassination was that the shootout shot Mile Lukovic rather than Milorad Ulemek, the former Red Beret commander who had been recruited along with Zemun crime boss Spasojevic back in December 2002 by Kostunica's emissaries Rade Bulatovic, his security adviser, and General Aco Tomic, the military intelligence chief, to do the job, once released from prison. The arrangement showed that changes in Yugoslavia were much smaller than the outside world had anticipatated. Kostunica was conspiring to create a Serbia without Milosevic and its state-dominated economy, thanks to crucial assistance by his former security network. Djindjic's assassination would cap the process, leading to the drying up of war criminals going to The Hague, especially Bosnia's Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic.

The assassination itself went off like clockwork on March 12, 2003 - with the two assassins lying in wait for hours until Djindjic was clearly in sight while on his way to meet fellow opponent of the current Israeli administration, Sweden's Foreign Minister Anna Lindh, and while the surveillance cameras were conveniently turned off - but the process was badly damaged when the wrong Lukovic was assassinated during the shootout with crime boss Spasojevic two weeks later. Milorad Ulemek was tipped off about his demise, apparently with help from the Mossad, and made his escape to Hungary, only to return voluntarily 14 months later when Kostunica was firmly in place as Serbia's Prime Minister, guaranteeing that all the important questions about the killing would remain unanswered.

In the interim, the key witness, Kujo Krijestorac, was assassinated on the second try, March 1, 2004. Krijestorac, a respectable businessman, had seen two assassins and their accomplices, fleeing from their sniper's nest - what threatened the veracity of the freely-offered confession of Zvezdan 'Zveki' Jovanovic, a former deputy commander of the Red Berets, who claimed that the missing Ulemek had persuaded him alone to do all the dirty work.

When this convenient confession did not wind up the trial, Dejan 'Bugsy' Milenkovic and others treated the court to tales about who did, and who didn't commit all kinds of killings, thanks to all kinds of gossip from people, particularly the dead Spasojevic, but no one heard a word about the involvement of either Kostunica or Bulatovic in the process. Even when Ulemek finally turned himself in, prosecutors dealt first with his assassination of former Yugoslavian President Ivan Stambolic, and an attempted one on the current Foreign Minister, Vuk Draskovic, which killed four of his bodyguards to make sure that the evidence against him from these trials would stick in the Djindjic one.

While the verdict in the case hardly satisfied anyone - most people, especially Djindjic family counsel and that for his bodyguard wounded during the assassination -believing that a complicated conspiracy had occurred in which five of the 12 convicted were still at large - things were hardly progressing better at The Hague. Instead of Milosevic's trial, thanks to additional charges against him of human-rights abuses, proving that he had called the shots in Bosnia and Kosovo, he turned it into a venue, as The Times concluded after he had been driven to his own death, where he portrayed himself as a hero of the Serbian people. In fact, the process proved so effective that those who might have really called the shots - first Ljubisa Beara, head of the Bosnian Serb security service, and now former Major General Zdravko Tolimir, intelligence chief of Mladic's Srpska Army Staff -started turning themselves into the ICTY, knowing that their punishment would never fit their crimes as those somewhat responsible for them, apparently Dagan's Mossad, would never be identified.
This was alluded to when Milosevic's former lawyer Geoffrey Nice complained that Chief Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte had made a deal with Serbian Foreign Minister Goran Svilanovic shortly after Djindjic had been assassinated that key Serbian military and political documents dealing with Bosnia and Kosovo would not be made public if they were handed over to the ICTY - what helped the International Criminal Court find in February that Serbia, as a state, had not been guilty of genocide for what happened in Srebrenica in July 1995. Svilanovic had been most involved in strengthening bilateral relations with Israel after Milosevic's ouster, and in stonewalling the flow of key documents to The Hague. No sooner was Djindjic dead than the Foreign Minister wrote to Del Porte, stating that they would be supplied, provided they were never released to the public. (For more on this, see Lisa Clifford, "Del Ponte Denies Belgrade Deal Claims," Dnevrik Triband, April 20, 2007.)

Instead of stating what the documents disclosed, though - what led observers to speculate that that they must have involved what happened in SDC meetings in Belgrade at the time - Nice got the Chief Prosecutor riled up about having apparently approved the deal without proper authority. Actually, she just passed along what the judges had approved, leaving their import largely unknown. All that was said about them was that they did not involve Serbian national security. So, whose national security did they involve? It seems that it must have been Israel's, showing that its officials and combatants had helped in the Srebrenica genocide - the worst holocaust in Europe since The Holocaust - hardly something anyone in Europe wanted to imply. And Djindjic had certainly added his name to the list of its victims by being Serbia's biggest proponent of all its culprits going to The Hague to answer for their war crimes.

Similarly, the killing of British microbiologist and former UNSCOM inspector for chemical and biological weapons in Saddam Hussein's Iraq, Dr. David Kelly, on the night of July 17, 2003 on Harrowdown Hill, Oxfordshire, was never even seriously investigated, much less crudely explained, because the intelligence services who arranged it, and journalists who reported it wanted it that way, wittingly or unwittingly. The British services, particularly MI6, wanted the potentially most dangerous whistleblower so completely discredited that they had the Prime Minister publicly out him, leaving him completely vulnerable to a Mossad assassination kidon, it seems, after he had been the object of unprecedented public ridicule - resulting in a complete diversion about the cause of the Iraqi war which Washington most wanted, and about which the Iraqi dictator, despite his most dramatic lessons for alleged traitors, was in no position to do anything about.

Kelly's investigation and analysis of Iraq's WMD had been the basis of all the dossiers that Washington and London had drawn up after the 9/11 attacks in America regarding regime change in Iraq, though they did not want to show it, and he personally doubted that the dictator any longer possessed any. When this proved the case after he was toppled, all the statements by the Coalition leaders to justify the pre-emptive war proved most damaging. Australian PM John Howard had announced on its eve that it was ending an "inherently dangerous" situation by having "taken from her her chemical and biological weapons." (Gary Hughes, "Iraq: how we were duped," uruknet.info, p. 2) The previous September, British PM Tony Blair had released a dossier, stating it had established "beyond doubt" that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons, and is prepared to use them. American Secretary of State Colin Powell told the UN Security Council that Iraq had a stockpile of at least 100 tons of such material, ready to fire off at a moment's notice.

The most embarrassed party because of the failure to find WMD in Iraq was the Clinton administration which had put the 'bug in the bonnet' of both the Blair and Bush administrations about it, though one would never know it from reading various accounts about it, especially Bob Woodward's State of Denial. Bubba himself had often pronounced that Saddam's Iraq was a rogue state which had vast quantities of WMD which it was either prepared to use or to provide to other terrorists. (See his address, for example, to the Joint Chiefs of Staff on February 18, 1998.) Senior counterterrorist adviser on Clinton's NSC Richard Clarke even justified the missile attack on the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan during the showdown over Clinton's impeachment, claiming that he was "sure" that Iraqi nerve-gas experts were using such facilities to produce VX-like poison gases. (Vernon Loeb, "Official Cites Gains Against Bin Laden," The Washington Post, January 23, 1999, p. A02)

In fact, when the subsequent administrations were making up their dossiers about Saddam's WMD in anticipation of his ouster, former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger visited in May 2002 the National Archives to refresh his memory about what it had discussed and done about it - material in which Kelly's claims figured quite prominently, and Berger was most interested in what Clarke had recorded about it. What Kelly had told New York Times reporter Judith Miller and the BBC's Tom Mangold about Saddam's chemical and biological weapons programs had been largely responsible for President Clinton's near paranoia on the subject.

Of course, when neither Judy Miller, embedded in the US Army's 'Field Expedient' Artillery Brigade to find Saddam's massive chemical and biological weapon capability as the Coalition took over Iraq, nor the UN Iraqi Survey Group, led by David Kay, for the same purpose came up with anything to prove the wild claims, Kelly became increasingly uneasy about what had happened, especially his apparent role in it, and anxious to correct it. No sooner did Kelly learn that all the intelligence about Saddam's alleged WMD rested upon the most flimsey evidence than he started talking to the BBC's Andrew Gilligan, resulting in May 29th program which claimed that Blair's closest adviser Alastair Campbell had 'sexed up' the intelligence in the September dossier.

Instead of being dragged into another Serbian problem without proper preparation and care, this time the Mossad was well out in front, announcing to the British public while Kelly was dealing with Gilligan that it had sent a kidon assassination squad to assist its 15 domestic katsas in preventing more attacks on Israel - two suicide bombers from Britain had just attacked Mike's Place in Tel Aviv, killing three Israelis, and wounding many others. The Mossad was ordered to "carry the war to our enemies", and the threat to Israel or to Jewish institutions in Britain was considered real enough for the spy agency to take pre-emptive action against 50 Al-Muhajiroun, claiming that they were "primed and ready to go."

"We know from past experience that a kidon can make murder look like an accident," a MI5 source told Gordon Thomas, writer of "Mossad's Killing Machine Comes to Britain". "It is their specialty." While the kidon was not permitted to use either guns or explosives in Britain, it was equipped with long and short knives, along with piano wire for straggling suspects. Rafi Eitan, a former director of Mossad operations, added: "We are like the official hangman or the doctor on Death Row who administer the lethal injection. We ware simply fulfilling a sentence sanction by the prime minister of the day." While stressing that the love-hate relationship between Britain and Israel was over, Eitan added: "Nevertheless, the Mossad team will virtually operate on its own rules."

The White House moved to distance itself from the growing dispute between Downing Street, the BBC, and Kelly by starting one of its own after DCI George Tenet announced that the discredited Iraq-Niger uranium deal, claimed by the British government, should never have been included in the President's State of the Union speech before the war - apparently with the intention that it would be capturing the headlines if the one with Kelly turned dirty. Bush instructed Cheney to mount a campaign against former US American ambassador Joe Wilson for leaking findings of his inquiry into the 'yellowcake' claim - what Tenet embroidered by stating to Bob Woodward that his wife, Valerie Plame, worked as an Agency WMD analyst, and that she had gotten him the job.

On July 8th, Cheney's Chief of Staff 'Scooter' Libby passed the story on to Judy Miller, adding during a telephone conversation four days later that she should write about the highly secret parts of the National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam's WMD programs. For good measure, Wilson had gone public with his claims in a NYT Op-Ed piece, and syndicated columist Robert Novak "unmasked" Plame as the unknown Agency analyst. America was all abuzz when Kelly was apparently murdered three days later, and it was all intended to show that unauthorized leaking of most sensitive information, gossiping with reporters about such matters, lying about it all, loss of public reputation and employment for doing so, etc., were not the monopoly of London.

While a long book could be written about why, how, and by whom Kelly was murdered, we shall settle here for a most abbreviated version - what shows that it was a conspiracy murder, apparently conducted by the Mossad's resident kidon. Kelly provided no evidence that he would ever kill himself, no evidence that he actually did so, and if such matters were still so cut-and-dried, why did Blair order an unprecedented and uncalled for inquiry into it - what resulted in a most unsatisfactory result which few people believe. The Hutton Report is even more scandalous than the one the Warren Commission put together after President Kennedy's assassination.

To show that Kelly was murdered, one need only read the testimony of the first few witnesses who discovered the deceased, but were only interviewed by the inquiry after the case of suicide had essentially been made. On September 2nd, Louise Holmes, a member of the Thames Valley Lowland Search Team, told the inquiry how she, Paul Chapman, and her dog Brock found the deceased at 9:20 a.m. after having looked for an hour and a half. During it, they came across a party of three or four men who had spent the night in a moored boat along the Thames nearby. When asked if they had seen anything, she testified: "They said they had seen the helicopter up the previous night but they had not seen anybody or anything other than that." (Hutton interview, September 2, 2003, paragraph 10, lines 15-17)

Paul Chapman testify subsequently, stating that the party was composed of three or four people. "They had heard the helicopter," he continued, adding crucially, "and seen some police officers at some point previously." (ibid., paragraph 22, lines 24-25) Their testimony showed that these individuals had been in the area during the whole time that Kelly was said to have died, knew that some search and rescue mission was afoot, were not part of the police looking for the missing person, and did not leave the area when Holmes' search party was closing in on the dead Kelly.

The only way to explain this most extraordinary behavior is that they were involved in Kelly's disappearance and death, and were sticking around to see that he had been found dead - what would require a most hasty departure from not only the scene but also the country if he had still managed to survive from his struggle with them. (For more on this, see my e-mail below to the Hutton Inquiry about the murder (*) - what it never acknowledged the receipt of, much less answered, though it seems to have required Hutton to take more time in making his report.)

The Thames Valley Police's handling of all this, especially the four apparently unknown persons being in the area during which a controversial death occurred, is nothing short of scandalous. While it was apparently carrying out a surveillance operation to protect Kelly - Operation Mason - it seems never to have encourtered Kelly, the four men, and their boat while doing so, only having its DCs Graham Coe, Shields and possibly another rush directly from Kelly's house, a distance of about a mile, once a still unidentified person had reported seeing the boat people near the scene of the crime, to make sure that no one suspected anything more than the missing person had been found dead, apparently the victim of suicide. Coe did not seek out the boat and question the men on suspicion of having committed a crime. He only wanted to make the search party think that they belonged to the police.

Coe himself was questioned in a most perfunctory manner about the matter by the inquiry, never even asked if he was part of the police Chapman had referred to. Shields was never even interviewed by Hutton's people. The whole matter was conveniently covered up for them when Assistant Chief Constable Michael Page finally testified. He stated that all the persons in the area were police officers who he had accounted for, failing to mention the presence of the four men and their boat - what no one asked him about. This was all so successful that Hutton didn't mention anything about their presence, and confused the troublesome DC Graham Coe in his final Report.

The outing of the Agency's Valerie Plame caused similar turmoil in Washington, but at least she did not end up dead in the woods somewhere. Instead, Libby was finally sent to prison for 30 months, and fined $250,000 for his lies and obstruction of justice. Cheney immediately declassified the whole National Intelligence Estimate about Saddam's WMD programs to make sure that there were no more crimes committed in leaking its contents. Former President Clinton surprisingly appeared on Larry King LIve a few days later, justifying Saddam's ouster because he had not unaccounted for his WMD.

The most surprising thing of all, though, was former NSA Sandy Berger's trip back to the National Archives as soon as Kelly's death was reported to make sure its papers, especially those of Richard Clarke, did not show that the Clinton administration had panicked the Bush and Blair governments with claims from Kelly into doing the overkill that was now going on in Iraq and Afghanistan. Then, and once later in October, Berger surreptitiously removed several copies of a 15-page memo regarding the background to the 9/11 attacks, and failed to return one or more of them on his last visit to the Archives on October 2nd. While Clarke downplayed the significance of the missing memo, Berger gave up voluntarily his law practice in order to avoid any investigation of his malpractice by an American Bar Association inquiry.

The Israeli intelligence services, especially the Mossad, predictably blamed the death upon Israel's enemies - what Gordon Thomas lapped up - either the wily Chinese SIS or Saddam Hussein in case the Hutton inquiry still came up with a finding somehow of murder. The most diverting article was the one by Thomas, "The Secret World of Dr. David Kelly," which indicated that Kelly, who had worked with the Mossad, had probably been murdered by the feared Mukhabarat because of what he had done for the Israelis, and what he knew about what the Iraqi dictator had done illegally behind the scenes, particularly with the Chinese and Yugoslavia's ousted President Slobodan Milosevic. Kelly, according to Thomas, was just the last in a long line of microbiologists who had been murdered by the Iraqi intelligence service because of their efforts to provide Tel Aviv with a genetic weapon - what conspiracy theorists are still going on about when calling for a new inquiry into Kelly's murder. See these links:

Still, the Mossad had to be worried about what Hutton might still come up with. While the Israeli assassination had been an example of what Dagan's crítics had complained about when he was given the job of director - doing whatever he saw fit without any concern about foreign rules, relationships or reactions - Prime Minister Blair seemed to have encouraged the killing by the clever way he used to out Kelly - the most authoritative voice about how the Israelis themselves had really 'sexed up' the dossiers about Saddam's WMD - to the media.

The first stage of the examination of witnesses by the Hutton Inquiry had not clearly clarified matters either. While Blair's testimony had not indicated any serious complaints about what officials, domestic and foreign, had done during the tragedy, Hutton had been quite laid back during the proceedings, so much so that only a most careful reading of them would show that he had already decided how Kelly had died - by his own hand - when he adjourned the proceedings on September 4th to take stock of what it had been told. Hutton's announcement of possibly recalling witnesses or calling new ones, especially intelligence officials, and the possibility of their performance being officially criticized was still rather unsettling, since he alluded to no official ruling on the aim of the inquiry, to determine the cause of death.
This ten-day adjournment gave Dagan's men the opportunity they needed to get rid of the biggest thorn in the side of the Israeli government - the Swedish Foreign Minister, Anna Lindh. She stood for everything that Sharon did not want - e. g., preventing conflict, implementation of the Oslo Accords, the breakup of Yugoslavia and bringing Milosevic et al. to the ICTY to pay for various crimes against humanity, the NATO bombing campaign of Serbia to force his army to withdraw from Kosovo, working with Yasser Arafat, the legitimate leader of the Palestinian people, to institute the Road Map with Sharon's government, and the EU dropping diplomatic recognition of the Israeli government because of the way it was treating its Occupied Territories - and opposed almost everything that Tel Aviv wanted - the Iraq War and the ouster of Saddam Hussein, the extrajudicial killings of suspected Muslim terrorists by both the Israelis and Americans, unprecedented license to do whatever it wanted in the Middle East and beyond. Furthermore, she was in a much better position than anyone else in getting her way, being a increasingly powerful player in European politics who was expected to replace soon Göran Persson as Sweden's statsminster.

And the Mossad had the ideal candidate for building the assassination around, the 25-year old Mijailo Mijailovic - the product of a broken Swedish-Serbian home who had become a highly impulsive drop-out and druggie. His parents had come to Sweden after WWII, and he was born there, though he returned to Serbia when he was six, along with his mother and sister, to live in his grand parents' house in Mladenovac, and after retuning to Sweden, he often visited Serbia to see his father who had returned to Pozarevac, just east of Belgrade, subsequently. While living in both places, Mijailovic developed bad views of both Sweden and Euope, especially NÁTO since he constantly received complaints about them because he continued to reside in both.

Thanks to his experience in Sweden and to his travels to Serbia, he became increasingly depressed, so depressed that he wildly attacked his father with a knife when he was only 17, and another time he made an impulsive call to a woman he had been stalking, along with her sister, for four years, threatening her. He was also caught, possessing illegal weapons. Mijailo had a fixation about knives, and he spent more time sleeping than most people, thanks to the powerful sleeping tablets he took without a doctor's prescription. While he was supplied with anti-depressants to prevent such behavior leading to impulsive action, he was ultimately confined to a medical facility for treatment from which he was conveniently discharged just days before the assassination.

Sweden, like Britain, had apparently accepted the presence of a Mossad kidon and its katsas on its soil, thanks to an unprecedented address that MI5 director Eliza Manningham-Buller had delivered in London in June. She claimed that a major terrorist attack occurring in a major European city by Muslim terrorists was just a matter of time - recalling the alarm that British authorities had raised about Jewish interests in Stockholm just before Olof Palme's assassination back in 1986. The presence of Mossad agents was justified again to prevent attacks upon Jews and Jewish institutions, especially the Orthodox Synogogue near the famous department NK in the city center, a condition which also allowed them to take any pre-emptive action they saw fit.


In this regard, the most alarming capability the Mossad had was subliminal mind control - what the famous conspiracy theorist Joe Vialls had recently written two articles about. Of course, most people consider Vialls to be just the opposite from Gordon Thomas when it comes to the Israeli agency - what Vialls claims could not possibly be true. In addition, most people think that the creation of 'voices' in other people's brains by microwave devices is just a fantasy, only believed by unbalanced persons, although the capability has long existed. Dr. Joseph Sharp successfully developed the technology at Walter Reed Army Research Institute in 1973 - what Dr. Robert Becker has fully explained in his book, The Body Electric. Such a device, easily assembled from components available at gun shops, could drive an unaware targeted individual crazy with 'voices' or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin. "Furthermore," as Alan Yu has added in his article "Microwave voice devices and patent", "if the invisible personnel pretend themselves (or him) as Devil (angel or God) during sending microwave voices, it can mislead the unknowning victim to following their order/voices to commit crimes..." In order to avoid such results, Yu recommended: "If you hear microwave 'voices' in head, it must be sent by invisible operators with microwave device and don't listen to it to kill."

Well, Mijailo was put through such torment when he returned to his apartment in a southern suburb of Stockholm, once released from the medical hospital, increasingly hearing 'voices' while he had trouble sleeping - what put him in no position to resist such calls when September 10th arrived. Thanks to his previous days stalking Lindh and other politicians involved in the referendum campaign over the adoption of the euro, he started out from his apartment with the same objective in mind for central Stockholm, only to be directed to a shop, The Pub, where 'voices' urged him to steal a knife, and go to NK. At the same time, the kidon, it seems, was keeping track of what Lindh - who had just days before blamed Israel and America for the breakdown of peace talks regarding the implementation of the Road Map - and a friend were planning on doing during her lunch break, and followed them to the department store where Mijailovic was now moving aimlessly around its atrium.

"I was on my way out," he explained later, "but took a wrong turn and saw Anna Lindh. Then the voices came." Being in such an open space, the microwaves had no trouble reaching Mijailovic's brain from any location. They were in Serbo-Croat, indicating that his programmer was a fellow Serb who was using cultural ties to pump up his courage to kill her. "I couldn't resist the voices," Mijailo added, especially since they came from Jesus Christ who urged him to attack her. Once involved in the process of stabbling her, his mental instability took over, making a meal of the matter. The most important evidence of the assassination was the film in the surveillance cameras in the store - what was bound to lead to his discovery - but they were not used to see if he was accompanied by someone else - what other statements by him indicated. Once caught, the only real question was whether he was temporarily insane when he killed her or whether he only suffering from diminished mental responsbility when he did it. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled the latter, though giving no indication of who might also be responsible for the tragedy.

The denouement of the whole process occurred the following January when the Israeli Ambassador to Sweden Zvi Mazel - who had said that Lindh's criticism of Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians could not be tolerated - viewed the art work of Dror and Gunilla Feiler at an exhibition at the Museum of National Antiquities, angrily vandalizing their depiction of the Palestinian tragedy as a two-sided struggle which resulted in a sea of blood. For Jews, and Dror is a Jew who belongs to "Jews for Palestinian Peace", to do such work was nothing short of treason, and Mazel went wild about the picture of suicide bomber Harradi Jaradat - who had shortly after Lindh's assassination killed many Israelis by bombing a Tel Aviv restaurant - floating in the boat on the red sea. On the other side of Jaradat's photograph, though, were written the words "Snow White" in Swedish, an obvious reference to the fallen Swedish leader, as Jaradat looked more like the "Black Madona", who had similarly been killed in the struggle.

While Tel Aviv defended Mazel's actions in a most knee-jerk fashion, he was soon retired for making such a spectacle over an inference that Israel had killed her too.

posted by ewar @ 10:22 AM

Recent Undisclosed Mossad 'False Flag' Operations, III
Right click the link above and copy the location to link directly to this article.


9 June 2007

Six days of war, 40 years of secrecy

The Age
Six days of war, 40 years of secrecy
Was the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty deliberate? The US is morally bound to find out.
Tim Fischer
May 27, 2007

FORTY years ago in a quiet corner of the Mediterranean off the Sinai Desert, an extraordinary attack was launched by Israeli jet fighters and torpedo boats on the USS Liberty.

It was the fourth day of the Six-Day War. The large intelligence-gathering ship was in international waters, proudly flying the US flag and clearly marked as the USS Liberty. Conditions were calm and clear, but by day's end 34 American sailors were killed and 172 injured.

The USS Liberty struggled back to Malta with several gaping holes and a US Navy Court of Inquiry team on board. The president of this inquiry was Admiral Isaac C. Kidd, and Captain Ward Boston jnr was counsel assisting, but under Pentagon orders the court was not permitted to travel to Israel to complete its investigations.

There is still a fierce debate over the question of whether the attack by Israeli forces was deliberate, allegedly mounted to disrupt US intelligence collection and provide cover for the day-five invasion of Syria and capture of the Golan Heights. Against this serious accusation, a book by retired US judge A. Jay Cristol, The Liberty Incident, contends that the attack was undertaken by Israeli jet fighters and Israeli torpedo boats, but was accidental.

As Donald Rumsfeld says, "stuff happens in war", and as Shimon Peres said about the cluster bombs into Southern Lebanon last year, "mistakes occur in war". However, as a reaction to the Cristol book, many key US intelligence officials and Boston himself have broken their strict orders under the Official Secrets Act to speak up and detail the chilling truth.

Boston signed an affidavit saying: "The evidence was clear. Both Admiral Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack … was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. It was our shared belief, based on the documentary evidence and testimony we received first-hand, that the Israeli attack was planned and deliberate."

The affidavit is readily available through Google, along with key statements debunking some official transcripts released to fudge the truth that involved helicopter pilots who arrived on the scene well after the first attacks.

This statement by Stephen Forslund (US Air Force intelligence analyst) is clear enough: "The transcripts made specific reference to the efforts to direct the jets to the target, which was identified as American numerous times by the ground controller. The ground control began asking about the status of the target and whether it was sinking. They stressed that the target must be sunk and leave no trace."

The reader can research the subject and reach a conclusion on deliberate or accidental. For my part, I now believe the evidence all points to it being a deliberate attack by Israel.

The two key issues arising from this are still relevant today. If Israel did deliberately attack the most powerful nation on Earth, it knows it can do so and get away with murder. Worse still, US military personnel now know that if the truth is politically inconvenient, they and their legacy are expendable.

The White House and Pentagon of the day, more so the US Congress, still need to get to the bottom of this saga.

Why is this important 40 years on? Because Israel needs to know that it will be exposed and held accountable for its actions and incidents, likewise Syria and the Palestinians, the latter of whom might contend the Liberty saga was one factor in delaying the creation of the nation state of Palestine.

We now know it is from this period that Israel cheerfully began building its own atomic bomb. We know Israel will push over the edge whenever it suits, because recent history shows that it can get away with such actions. Remember the thousands of cluster bombs that went into southern Lebanon last August after the ceasefire had been agreed but before its actual commencement?

But it is the US that has most to answer for in not dealing honestly with the attack on the USS Liberty, in turning its back on the families of the victims.

The Pentagon has ugly spin form — just ask the family of Pat Tillman killed by friendly fire in Afghanistan but initially reported otherwise. In relation to the 34 sailors killed by Israeli forces in 1967, it is corrosive in the extreme that the Pentagon did not fiercely fight to uncover the truth.

To the thousands of US and Allied forces, this is the really ugly part — the cause of their death will be airbrushed out if it is politically inconvenient for it to be revealed.

There are further allegations that US defence secretary of the time Robert McNamara and president Lyndon Johnson ordered US fighters, launched from a nearby US aircraft carrier, to turn back and not go to the defence of the USS Liberty. Again, the world is entitled to know whether this is true or not.

It is a sad fact that on June 8, 1967, the USS Liberty was attacked by Israeli jet fighters and Israeli torpedo boats; it is a sad fact that 34 US sailors were killed in the attack. It is true that Israel has paid some reparations to the families involved, and full marks to Israel in this regard. It remains for the real truth to come out.

A former attorney-general of Israel, Michael Ben-Yair, once made a famous observation:

"The Six-Day War was forced upon us, the seventh day continues to this day and is our choice."

Tim Fischer is a former deputy prime minister of Australia and a former army officer.

Remember the Liberty!


Remember the Liberty!
When Israel attacks, the Pentagon retreats
May 30, 2007

It was 40 years ago this June 8 that the USS Liberty – a large, armorless, refitted freighter that was gathering intelligence in the Mediterranean at the outset of the Six Day War – was attacked by Israeli fighter jets and torpedoes. Thirty-four U.S. sailors were killed, and 172 were wounded. The Liberty limped back to Malta. A U.S. Navy court of inquiry was on board investigating the damage, but – for some reason – the investigators were not allowed to proceed to Israel to find out what really went on. Orders from the top echelons of the Pentagon nixed the inquiry, and today, the families of the fallen still haven't gotten any answers as to why Israel was allowed to get away with it without even so much as a slap on the wrist – nor even any public acknowledgment that it was a deliberate attack.

Far from apologizing, the Israelis have to this day denied that they attacked the Liberty on purpose, and – incredibly – they stoutly maintain that the whole thing was an "accident." This in spite of the fact that the Liberty was proudly flying a U.S. flag and was easily identifiable as an American vessel. The Israel Lobby has even gone so far as to publish a book, The Liberty Incident, by Jay Cristol, that makes the case for the "accidental" scenario, but the survivors' families – and a number of credible commentators – aren't buying it. One of those commentators is a former captain in the Judge Advocate General Corps assigned to the Liberty investigation, Ward Boston, who has signed an affidavit stating unequivocally:

"The evidence was clear. Both Admiral [Isaac C.] Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack … was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. It was our shared belief, based on the documentary evidence and testimony we received firsthand, that the Israeli attack was planned and deliberate."

Capt. Boston says that Adm. Kidd, who was in charge of the subsequent inquiry, frequently referred to the Israelis as "murderous bastards," and a number of intelligence experts and U.S. officials seem to concur, albeit not in precisely those terms. Says former CIA director Richard Helms: "The board of inquiry [concluded] that the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing in attacking the Liberty." Former Secretary of State Dean Rusk says:

"I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation. … Through diplomatic channels we refused to accept their explanations. I didn't believe them then, and I don't believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous."

Even more outrageous was the cover-up by the Pentagon – and the White House of Lyndon "Hey Hey LBJ, How Many Kids Did You Kill Today?" Johnson. According to officer David Lewis, who was below deck at the time of the attack:

"[6th Rear Fleet Adm. Lawrence Geis] told me that since I was the senior Liberty survivor on board he wanted to tell me in confidence what had actually transpired. He told me that upon receipt of our SOS, aircraft were launched to come to our assistance, and then Washington was notified. He said that [Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara] had ordered that the aircraft be returned to the carrier, which was done. RADM Geis then said that he speculated that Washington may have suspected that the aircraft carried nuclear weapons so he put together another flight of conventional aircraft that had no capability of carrying nuclear weapons. These he launched to assist us and again notified Washington of his actions. Again McNamara ordered the aircraft recalled. He requested confirmation of the order being unable to believe that Washington would let us sink. This time President Johnson ordered the recall with the comment that he did not care if every man drowned and the ship sank, but that he would not embarrass his allies."

Rather than embarrass his "allies," the president of the United States caved in to the Lobbyput it in The Age: and buried the truth about the death of American servicemen under a mountain of obfuscation and official silence. As Tim Fischer, a former deputy prime minister of Australia and a former army officer,

"If Israel did deliberately attack the most powerful nation on Earth, it knows it can do so and get away with murder. Worse still, U.S. military personnel now know that if the truth is politically inconvenient, they and their legacy are expendable."

When it comes to the calculations of the Lobby, we are all expendable – that is the bitter lesson we are learning as a futile war in the Middle East not only rages on but threatens to expand beyond the borders of Iraq. Our "ally" Israel is an albatross hung 'round our necks, and it is slowly strangling America's chances of defeating Islamic extremism in the battle for the hearts and minds of Muslims worldwide. Will no one rid us of this troublesome "ally"?

I'm afraid they won't. The power of the Lobby, as explicated by scholars John J. MearsheimerStephen Walt, is as formidable as ever, if not more so. They ensure that there is no real debate over our Middle Eastern policy, either in Congress or in the councils of government policymakers. Their spies are allowed to get away with all sorts of activities that any other foreign power would soon feel Washington's wrath over. Their demands are considered the starting point for all policy decisions, and they are rewarded for their lack of loyalty to their main benefactor by being showered with all manner of gifts: "foreign aid," loan guarantees, and technology transfers that have enabled them to build up a military capacityincluding nuclear weapons – that knows no rival in the region. and

The attack on the Liberty and the subsequent whitewash of the Israelis is proof – if any more were needed – that Israel enjoys a position of preeminence within the councils of state that belies its small size and relative weakness as a settler colony totally dependent on outside infusions of support.

Critics may aver that this is all ancient history, that there is no reason to bring up the attack on the Liberty, and even if it wasn't an accident, it's time to let bygones be bygones. The Lobby constantly asserts that anyone who even mentions this "incident" is nothing but an anti-Semite, because, after all, why talk about it now? The reason is that it underscores the utter falsity of the argument that Israeli and American interests are uniquely and perpetually in perfect alignment. The Israelis attacked the Liberty, according to several books and a BBC documentary on the subject, in order to prevent the U.S. government from learning of Israeli plans to occupy the Golan Heights – a sliver of land that rightfully belongs to Syria, and which is still causing a great many problems for U.S. interests in the region. The stunning fact of the American government's complicity in hiding the truth about an attack on its own soldiers is all we need to know about what's wrong with American foreign policy – and what is the exact source of the problem.


40 Years Ago - Israel's Attempt To Sink The USS Liberty

40 Years Ago - Israel's Attempt To Sink The USS Liberty
Time For The Truth About The USS Liberty
The San Diego Union-Tribune
By Ward Boston, Jr.
6-9-7

"Those God-Damned Murdering Bastards Intended To Kill Everyone On Board."
-- Ward Boston, Captain, USN retired. Chief legal officer investigating the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty.
  • Forty years ago to this day, thirty four American Sailors were murdered on the high seas. There crime goes unanswered. They will not be forgotten. It's time to clear the air. This is not going to go away.

  • As senior legal counsel to the Navy Court of Inquiry, it was my job to help uncover the truth regarding Israel's June 8, 1967, bombing of the Navy intelligence ship Liberty.

  • Forty years ago this week, I was asked to investigate the heaviest attack on an American ship since World War II. As senior legal counsel to the Navy Court of Inquiry, it was my job to help uncover the truth regarding Israel's June 8, 1967, bombing of the Navy intelligence ship Liberty.
  • On that sunny, clear day 40 years ago, Israel's combined air and naval forces attacked the Liberty for two hours, inflicting 70 percent casualties. Thirty-four American sailors died, and 172 were injured. The Liberty remained afloat only by the crew's heroic efforts.

  • Israel claimed it was an accident. Yet I know from personal conversations with the late Adm. Isaac C. Kidd - president of the Court of Inquiry - that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of "mistaken identity."

  • The ensuing cover-up has haunted us for 40 years. What does it imply for our national security, not to mention our ability to honestly broker peace in the Middle East, when we cannot question Israel's actions - even when they kill Americans?

  • Today, survivors of Israel's cruel attack will gather in Washington, D.C., to honor their dead shipmates as well as the mothers, sisters, widows and children they left behind. They will continue to ask for a fair and impartial congressional inquiry that, for the first time, would allow the survivors themselves to testify publicly.

  • For decades, I have remained silent. I am a military man, and when orders come in from the secretary of defense and president of the United States, I follow them. However, attempts to rewrite history and concern for my country compel me to share the truth.

  • Adm. Kidd and I were given only one week to gather evidence for the Navy's official investigation, though we both estimated that a proper Court of Inquiry would take at least six months.

  • We boarded the crippled ship at sea and interviewed survivors. The evidence was clear. We both believed with certainty that this attack was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew.

  • I am certain the Israeli pilots and commanders who had ordered the attack knew the ship was American. I saw the bullet-riddled American flag that had been raised by the crew after their first flag had been shot down completely. I heard testimony that made it clear the Israelis intended there be no survivors. Not only did they attack with napalm, gunfire and missiles, Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned at close range three life rafts that had been launched in an attempt to save the most seriously wounded.

  • I am outraged at the efforts of Israel's apologists to claim this attack was a case of "mistaken identity."

  • Adm. Kidd told me that after receiving the president's cover-up orders, he was instructed to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Department of Defense and rewrite portions of the court's findings. He said, "Ward, they're not interested in the facts. It's a political matter, and we cannot talk about it." We were to "put a lid on it" and caution everyone involved never to speak of it again.

  • I know that the Court of Inquiry transcript that has been released to the public is not the same one that I certified and sent to Washington. I know this because it was necessary, due to the exigencies of time, to hand-correct and initial a substantial number of pages. I have examined the released version of the transcript and did not see any pages that bore my hand corrections and initials. Also, the original did not have any deliberately blank pages, as the released version does. In addition, the testimony of Lt. Lloyd Painter concerning the deliberate machine-gunning of the life rafts by the Israeli torpedo boat crews, which I distinctly recall being given at the Court of Inquiry and including in the original transcript, is now missing.

  • I join the survivors in their call for an honest inquiry. Why is there no room to question Israel - even when it kills Americans - in the halls of Congress?

  • Let the survivors testify. Let me testify. Let former intelligence officers testify that they received real-time Hebrew translations of Israeli commanders instructing their pilots to sink "the American ship."

  • Surely uncovering the truth about what happened to American servicemen in a bloody attack is more important than protecting Israel. And surely 40 years is long enough to wait.

  • Ward Boston Jr.
  • Boston served as chief counsel to the Navy's Court of Inquiry into the attack on the U.S. Navy intelligence ship Liberty. He also served as a naval aviator in World War II on the carrier Yorktown and as an FBI agent prior to his assignment to the Navy's Judge Advocates General Corps. He is a graduate of the College of William and Mary School of Law and a resident of Coronado.
  • My Labels